Lesson 06 — Honoring Living Musicians: Engagement, Not Appropriation

Learners sort music scenarios to distinguish respectful engagement with a musical tradition from appropriation, learning to ask, learn context, credit, and share benefit — and to honor the living musicians and communities who made the music.

D07 P3: Intellectual & Cognitive Awareness D07.S2 55 minutes Draft

How do I tell respectful engagement with a musical tradition from appropriation, and how do I honor living musicians and communities?

engagementappropriationsamplingcreditpermissionroyaltyliving traditionorigin
A flowchart with three branches from "I want to use another culture's music" — "learn it" leading to "ask, credit, share benefit," "sample it" leading to "permission and royalty," and "claim it as mine" leading to a stop sign labeled "appropriation"
A flowchart with three branches from "I want to use another culture's music" — "learn it" leading to "ask, credit, share benefit," "sample it" leading to "permission and royalty," and "claim it as mine" leading to a stop sign labeled "appropriation"

Lesson 6 — Honoring Living Musicians: Engagement, Not Appropriation

Summary

Learners sort music scenarios to tell respectful engagement with a musical tradition from appropriation, learning to ask, learn the context, credit, and share benefit — and to honor the living musicians and communities who made the music. Reggae, spirituals, and the griot tradition show how music carries a community’s history, so using it carries an ethical responsibility.

Objectives

  • Distinguish respectful engagement with a musical tradition from appropriation, and explain how to honor living musicians and communities. (D07.S2.10.02)

Connection

You would not want someone to take a song you wrote, perform it for money, and never say your name. That instinct — credit the maker, share the benefit — is the whole lesson. Music is never just sound; it is made by people in places, carrying their history. Engaging with it respectfully means treating those people as the point, not as a free library of sounds.

Materials

  • Engagement-or-appropriation scenario cards
  • Two-column reflection sheet

Preparation

  • Retrieval: from Lesson 2, recall your rule for honoring living visual traditions. Today you apply the same four questions — ask, context, credit, benefit — to music.
  • Prepare the four scenarios (see Facilitator note) and the reflection sheet.

Facilitator note

This lesson is written to the learner (“you”). The idea to land: the same four questions from visual art govern music — did they ask? learn the context? credit? share benefit? — because music, too, is a living tradition made by living people. Reggae originated among marginalized groups in western Kingston, Jamaica, and became “a voice for all” on injustice, resistance, love, and humanity (S-450; S-445). African American spirituals are religious folk songs born of enslavement that carry a people’s history (S-385). West African griots are hereditary oral historians and musicians who keep a community’s memory — their music is not decoration but archive (S-446). Because music travels and is sampled in one click, credit and permission are more urgent, not less.

Keep it concrete and never flatten a tradition into a stereotype. The ethical distinction is about power and consent: learning a tradition from its practitioners, crediting composers and performers, paying royalties where due, and amplifying the community’s own voices is engagement; sampling or performing without permission or credit, claiming others’ forms as your own “discovery,” or profiting while the makers earn nothing is appropriation. UNESCO’s living-heritage frame (S-056) and the Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (S-389) support treating music as owned and passed on by communities.

The ethics lens is the spine. The egalitarian lens: musical appropriation almost always flows from the less powerful to the more powerful — credit and shared benefit are how the balance is corrected. The global lens: traditions are people’s, alive now, not “world music” free for the taking. The technology lens: sampling and streaming made reuse effortless, so the ethical work (permission, credit, royalty) is the part a machine cannot do. The environment lens: honoring a tradition includes honoring the places and materials it grew from, not extracting the sound and discarding the rest. Preview: Lesson 7 turns to the body — devising a movement piece.

Four scenarios (adapt to your place; keep specific and respectful): 1. A musician studies with a community’s players, learns the meaning of the form, credits them, and shares the earnings. 2. A producer samples a traditional recording without permission, lists no composer, and keeps the profit. 3. A choir learns a spiritual from recordings and from a living singer of that tradition, and names the tradition in the program. 4. A brand uses a people’s ceremonial song in an advertisement without asking or paying, turning a sacred sound into a jingle.

Procedure

  1. Recall (5 min). From Lesson 2: four questions — ask, context, credit, benefit. Today you run them on music.
  2. Meet the distinction (10 min). Watch a worked example: a musician who studies with a community, credits them, and shares earnings — versus a producer who samples without permission, lists no composer, and keeps the profit. One honors; one takes.
  3. Sort the scenarios (15 min). With a partner, read the four cards. Place each under “Honors living musicians” or “Takes from them,” and write one reason using the four questions.
  4. Hear the history (10 min). Consider three real traditions: reggae as the voice of Kingston’s marginalized communities (S-450), spirituals born of enslavement (S-385), and griots as keepers of memory (S-446). Why does context matter so much for music like this?
  5. Write your rule (10 min). Write your own two-sentence rule for engaging with another culture’s music. Start: “I will honor living musicians by ______.”
  6. Close (5 min). Add the sheet to your portfolio. Next: the moving body.

Differentiation

  • Support: Give the four questions as a checklist and ask only “credited — yes or no?” for each scenario.
  • Extension: Look up who wrote and who owns a familiar song, and trace where the money from one stream goes — then propose one fairer arrangement.
  • Non-hearing / low-literacy path: The four scenarios and the histories of reggae, spirituals, and griots can be read as text rather than listened to; the “hear the history” step becomes “read the history” with no loss. Learners answer aloud or in writing, and the reflection may be recorded in voice.
  • Language: Learners may write or speak their rule in their home language first, then translate to a shared classroom language; the four questions carry cleanly across languages.

Assessment

  • Formative (self): Can the learner sort each scenario and give one reason (permission, context, credit, or benefit) for at least two of them?
  • Portfolio artifact (unit): The two-column reflection with the learner’s own two-sentence rule, added to the portfolio.

Home connection

Pick a song you love. Find out who wrote it, who performs it, and where it comes from. Tell someone at home one thing you learned about its makers.

Resources